This Document is very long, even though it is only a portion of the entire brief.
Please be patient as loading times can be several minutes.
The following is the majority of the Appellant Brief submitted by Colorado State Public Defenders, Carol L. Gerstl and Norman L. Mueller, appealing to the Colorado Supreme Court in response to the December 1976 trial of Ken Botham. Those parts left out include lengthy legal discussion of capitol punishment.
This brief endeavors to expose the inconsistencies of the trial in order to explain why the defense/defendant felt the trial was in error. The first trial included many legal error and violations of Ken Botham's legal rights. Each violation would suffice, if founded, to entitle Ken Botham a new trial or acquittal. A second trial was awarded.
The following sections are bookmarks in the appellant brief. These selections were included in the brief to summarize the events, evidence, and actions that occurred in order to document the errors and violations during the trial process. Again, please be patient if you use slower connection speeds.
|4. The Investigation|
|5. The Penalty Hearing|
More excerpts from the Arguments section of the Appellant Brief.
|1. What the jurors knew, preconceived ideas before entering the trial.|
|2. Appendix A - mitigating factors, aggravating factors|
home case overview book background evidence trial notes ken's journal entries - 1 2 3 4 people
news clippings questions & answers - 1 2 mitigating & aggravating factors appellate brief
Colorado Supreme Court's response juror prejudices contact us